you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
OnePlus Nord 3 reviews by real users OnePlus Nord 3
- Ki Cost-effective Score9
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Camera quality
- Display quality
- Charging Speed
Cons- No water and dust protection
- No Telephoto lens
- 6.74"AMOLED20:9
- 193 g75.1 mm162.8 mm8.1 mm
- Dimensity 9000 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 1.103.441
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 IMX890 23SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User score
- 20
- 0
- 3
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.9
- Performance9.1
- Camera8.6
- Connectivity9.2
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Performance & Hardware
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Camera
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Connectivity
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 17%Less than a day
- 30%One day
- 48%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
23 reviews
Software
- 22%It comes with a clean operating system
- 78%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
23 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 32%Every six months
- 68%Every two months or less
23 reviews
User reviews
- AutoGreat mid-range phone
An excellent mid-range phone, perhaps the best phone today in terms of price-quality ratio in the price range of 400 usd Excellent screen, Delayed main camera, especially in night mode, good selfie camera Very fast charging Good performance and communication Already withstood being poured with a glass of water without drying out Nice design Good sound, excellent vibration response
Pros- main camera (especially night mode)
- selfie camera
- operating speed
- sound
- screen
- battery + charging speed
Cons- add telephoto
- no eSIM
View original review- 9.9
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera9.6
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood quality price
I looked for a good Oneplus in the store and they offered me this one over the 12R saying that it was better quality - price, and they were not wrong. It is a mid-range with high-end quality and for half the price
Pros- Battery
- The screen has very good resolution
- Pretty fast
Cons- Selfie camera could be better
View original review- 8.5
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoVery good smartphone
After 3 months it works well for me, first experience with oxygenOS and I liked it more than MIUI, although some customization options are missing, habit. Good weight but without a cover it slips. Good stereo sound. The volume buttons on the opposite side of the power cause a lot of seizures. Scratch resistant screen, I don't use a screen protector and it has had a few falls and is fine. The fingerprint sensor on the screen works perfectly for me. RAM perfect. I have rarely had some crashes (it stops for 2 or 3 seconds until it comes back to itself) with Chrome mainly and some lag with another app. The battery maintains the temperature well with continuous use, it may feel a little warmer if you ask a lot of it. (After 3 months of use I notice that the phone gets hotter than before.) It does get about 8 hours of screen time, practically with the default settings. It seems to me to be a super-balanced smartphone and a great purchase. Let's hope it lasts.
Pros- weight
- battery
- fast charge
- screen
- sound
Cons- casing slips
- volume buttons
- phone gets hot
View original review- 9.7
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoVery happy with the purchase -> BAD PURCHASE
The phone is very nice and comfortable in the hand, the screen looks great and runs very fluid. I come from a POCO It is true that sometimes the battery can fall short but it compensates with the charging speed. UPDATE: I had to return it because the battery ran out very quickly, a total disappointment.
Pros- Fast charge
- Screen
Cons- Absence of Jack 3.5
View original review- 4.9
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 4 days ago
- Operating System 1 month ago
- Features 6 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 10 months ago
- AnTuTu 10 months ago
- On Sale 10 months ago
- Selfie Camera 11 months ago
- Selfie Camera 11 months ago
- Pros & Cons 11 months ago
- Usable surface 11 months ago
Score
- 8.2 Design & Materials
- 8.2 Performance & Hardware
- 7.6 Camera
- 8.6 Connectivity
- 7.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.