7.9

Motorola Edge 30 Neo reviews by real users Motorola Edge 30 Neo

User score

Overall satisfaction
8.8
  • 14
  • 5
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
20 reviews
  • Screen8.9
  • Performance8.9
  • Camera7.8
  • Connectivity9.2
  • Battery7.3
Want to comment on the Motorola Edge 30 Neo?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
7.8

20 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
9.4

20 reviews

Is it comfortable?
9.6

20 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
8.7

20 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
9.4

20 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
8.8

20 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
8.5

20 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
8.6

20 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
7.1

20 reviews

Quality of selfies
7.5

20 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
8.1

20 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
9.3

20 reviews

Quality of the GPS
9.1

20 reviews

And the WiFi?
9.3

20 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 5%
    Less than half day
  • 10%
    Less than a day
  • 45%
    One day
  • 35%
    More than one day
  • 5%
    Two days or more

20 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 35%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 65%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 0%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

20 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 0%
    Never
  • 18%
    Once a year
  • 55%
    Every six months
  • 27%
    Every two months or less

20 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Very comfortable size

    • 9.5
    • Screen10
    • Performance9.5
    • Camera8.2
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Top

    • 10
    • Screen10
    • Performance10
    • Camera10
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Good, but it could be better!

    It's a good cell phone, it won't give you anything more than satisfactory performance. In everyday life it works well, in heavy games it was surprising, but when its GPU is required by heavy games it starts to heat up a little and it becomes a bit uncomfortable to hold it in your hands. The camera is good but disappoints in night environments, its focus is sometimes confused. The interface that Motorola uses is cool, but it lacks features and still needs to mature a lot considering that it has evolved a lot, but it is still far from Samsung's OneUI. The battery lasts a full day of moderate use.

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Processor
    • GPU
    Cons
    • CPU
    • Screen
    • Interface
    • 5.9
    • Screen6.2
    • Performance6.3
    • Camera4.5
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Cameras much lower than expected!

    The smartphone is an excellent size, with a good hardware configuration, however the cameras do not live up to its specifications, the photos have washed out colors and very poor focus and at night it becomes short-sighted and cannot deliver decent photos. The front camera delivers horrible results comparable to a basic 2020 smartphone.

    Pros
    • 68W fast charging
    • 6.3" screen
    • 256GB
    • 8GB RAM
    Cons
    • Cameras
    • Frontal camera
    • YOU CANNOT REVERSE THE NAVIGATION BUTTONS
    • 6.1
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance8.5
    • Camera3.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Excellent battery for its compact size

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Camera
    • Screen
    • Fast charge
    • Sound
    Cons
    • Fluency
    • Auto Brightness
    • 7.9
    • Screen10
    • Performance7.0
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity9.3
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    It's good but it lacks selfie and power

    • 7.6
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera7.2
    • Connectivity8.6
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Cell phone with bad cameras, average battery and good performance

    I had a good experience in daily use and in games (Genshin, Honkai Star Rail, Real Racing 3, Minecraft, COD and ETC), but I had horrible performance when it came to emulators. The 695 should run emulators in general in a very satisfactory and concrete way, but it was probably covered by Motorola's (clean) system. Since a cell phone with the same specifications (poco X5 5G) has a much better experience. Shameful

    Pros
    • Screen
    • Sound
    • Fluidity
    • Connectivity
    Cons
    • Performance
    • Operational system
    • 8.5
    • Screen9.5
    • Performance9.0
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity9.3
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Fluent

    Pros
    • Size
    • Fluent
    • Fast charge
    Cons
    • Battery
    • 8.9
    • Screen9.3
    • Performance9.5
    • Camera8.2
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Best buy for less than 300 euros?

    I state that I come from a Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro; I've had this phone for two weeks now and I must say it's really a pleasure to use. 120hz OLED screen, 8 gigs of RAM, plastic shell but with a top-of-the-range feel. The (almost) stock android experience is really smooth compared to Xiaomi's MIUI, I don't think I could go back now! It's like a Pixel but with a few tweaks from Motorola that certainly can't hurt. This phone's camera is perhaps its weakest point but it's absolutely not terrible for the price. As for the battery, its 6-7 hours of screen makes them, so for me it is promoted, especially if we consider that it supports fast charging at 68w and wireless charging (!!) at 5 watts. I say? I say. At 300 euros it's a best buy, especially if you want a compact phone at an affordable price, a market segment unfortunately often unexplored by big manufacturers.

    Pros
    • Screen
    • Compactness
    • Build quality
    • Wireless charging
    • stereo speakers
    Cons
    • Camera
    • 10
    • Screen8.2
    • Performance8.6
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity9.6
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Spectacular phone but with buts

    The battery is excellent with WiFi, with data a normal use gives you 5 hours or less, the camera is ok, the screen is missing the hdr, but very good brightness and colors

    Pros
    • Screen
    • Sound
    • connectivity
    • Fast charge
    Cons
    • Battery with mobile data
    • lack of hdr
    • The motorcycle upgrade policy
    • 9.4
    • Screen9.2
    • Performance9.5
    • Camera8.6
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
June 24, 2024
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 6 days ago
  • Features 9 days ago
  • Operating System 1 year ago
  • Version 1 year ago
  • Name, Storage 1 year ago
  • Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Sensor Model, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
  • On Sale, Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Inches, Density, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Capacity (mAh), Fast charge, Market, RAM, Screen Type, Sensor Type, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Fingerprint 1 year ago
7.9
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 7.3 Design & Materials
  • 6.6 Performance & Hardware
  • 7.0 Camera
  • 7.8 Connectivity
  • 5.4 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.