you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Edge 30 Neo reviews by real users Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- 6.28"pOLEDFHD+20:9
- 155 g71.2 mm152.9 mm7.8 mm
- SnapD. 695 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 425.200
- 4020 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 OV64B 2SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 14
- 5
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.9
- Performance8.9
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity9.2
- Battery7.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Performance & Hardware
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Camera
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Connectivity
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Battery
- 5%Less than half day
- 10%Less than a day
- 45%One day
- 35%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
20 reviews
Software
- 35%It comes with a clean operating system
- 65%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
20 reviews
- 0%Never
- 18%Once a year
- 55%Every six months
- 27%Every two months or less
20 reviews
User reviews
- AutoGood, but it could be better!
It's a good cell phone, it won't give you anything more than satisfactory performance. In everyday life it works well, in heavy games it was surprising, but when its GPU is required by heavy games it starts to heat up a little and it becomes a bit uncomfortable to hold it in your hands. The camera is good but disappoints in night environments, its focus is sometimes confused. The interface that Motorola uses is cool, but it lacks features and still needs to mature a lot considering that it has evolved a lot, but it is still far from Samsung's OneUI. The battery lasts a full day of moderate use.
Pros- Battery
- Processor
- GPU
Cons- CPU
- Screen
- Interface
View original review- 5.9
- Screen6.2
- Performance6.3
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoCameras much lower than expected!
The smartphone is an excellent size, with a good hardware configuration, however the cameras do not live up to its specifications, the photos have washed out colors and very poor focus and at night it becomes short-sighted and cannot deliver decent photos. The front camera delivers horrible results comparable to a basic 2020 smartphone.
Pros- 68W fast charging
- 6.3" screen
- 256GB
- 8GB RAM
Cons- Cameras
- Frontal camera
- YOU CANNOT REVERSE THE NAVIGATION BUTTONS
View original review- 6.1
- Screen7.7
- Performance8.5
- Camera3.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoCell phone with bad cameras, average battery and good performance
I had a good experience in daily use and in games (Genshin, Honkai Star Rail, Real Racing 3, Minecraft, COD and ETC), but I had horrible performance when it came to emulators. The 695 should run emulators in general in a very satisfactory and concrete way, but it was probably covered by Motorola's (clean) system. Since a cell phone with the same specifications (poco X5 5G) has a much better experience. Shameful
Pros- Screen
- Sound
- Fluidity
- Connectivity
Cons- Performance
- Operational system
View original review- 8.5
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoBest buy for less than 300 euros?
I state that I come from a Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro; I've had this phone for two weeks now and I must say it's really a pleasure to use. 120hz OLED screen, 8 gigs of RAM, plastic shell but with a top-of-the-range feel. The (almost) stock android experience is really smooth compared to Xiaomi's MIUI, I don't think I could go back now! It's like a Pixel but with a few tweaks from Motorola that certainly can't hurt. This phone's camera is perhaps its weakest point but it's absolutely not terrible for the price. As for the battery, its 6-7 hours of screen makes them, so for me it is promoted, especially if we consider that it supports fast charging at 68w and wireless charging (!!) at 5 watts. I say? I say. At 300 euros it's a best buy, especially if you want a compact phone at an affordable price, a market segment unfortunately often unexplored by big manufacturers.
Pros- Screen
- Compactness
- Build quality
- Wireless charging
- stereo speakers
Cons- Camera
View original review- 10
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoSpectacular phone but with buts
The battery is excellent with WiFi, with data a normal use gives you 5 hours or less, the camera is ok, the screen is missing the hdr, but very good brightness and colors
Pros- Screen
- Sound
- connectivity
- Fast charge
Cons- Battery with mobile data
- lack of hdr
- The motorcycle upgrade policy
View original review- 9.4
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.5
- Camera8.6
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 6 days ago
- Features 9 days ago
- Operating System 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Sensor Model, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
- On Sale, Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Inches, Density, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Capacity (mAh), Fast charge, Market, RAM, Screen Type, Sensor Type, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Fingerprint 1 year ago
Score
- 7.3 Design & Materials
- 6.6 Performance & Hardware
- 7.0 Camera
- 7.8 Connectivity
- 5.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.